A steadfast commitment to quality has always been a key part of the ethos at Axis. Quality assurance starts from the initial design phase and continues throughout the product journey - from design to component sourcing, to manufacturing, delivery and beyond. Manufacturing products that are consistently of the highest standard can only be achieved if the entire supply chain reflects the same commitment to quality.

The key is ensuring that the right suppliers are chosen and deep, reciprocal relationships are formed. Here one can explore how Axis ensures quality is embedded throughout its supply chain. Quality starts at the drawing board, in the initial design of products. Using the principles of Design for Manufacturing (DFM) and Design for Assembly (DFA), Axis is putting the foundations in place for product quality through consistency of the components specified and, subsequently, product manufacturing.

Systems integrators

Axis works with suppliers in two main ways: sourcing and manufacturing. Components are sourced from suppliers by Axis before being delivered to manufacturing partners where products are created. Contract manufacturers in various locations around the world assemble the products. These then pass through one of Axis’ Configuration & Logistic Centers where they are subject to further quality control, before finding their way to distributors, systems integrators and, ultimately, customers.

All of Axis’ suppliers are evaluated before being added to the Axis approved vendor list

All of Axis’ suppliers are evaluated before being added to the Axis approved vendor list. This involves regular on-site visits performed by Axis’ auditors to ensure that they meet the strict requirements. In addition, the company must be certified by a third party according to ISO 9001 or IATF 16949. The company’s procedures for risk management are also evaluated, as well as the production facilities and process, and all suppliers need to sign the Axis Supplier Code of Conduct.

Commitment to quality

As an additional quality assurance measure, all critical assembly and test equipment is developed and provided by Axis. Every product is tested and qualified in a functional test controlled by Axis prior to shipment. Quality must also be reflected in the final product itself, of course. Maintaining product integrity is critical and this can only be achieved if the product’s hardware and firmware are successfully protected from unauthorized change or manipulation during the its journey through the supply chain.

The supplier must adhere to all specifications, work instructions, or quality inspection documents and any changes or deviations are prohibited without Axis’ permission. In addition, all suppliers and manufacturers must maintain a rigorous traceability system to allow for faulty products to be tracked and identified. This allows for strict evaluation of associated processes and updates to be made.

Maintain necessary standards

Carl Trotzig, Director Quality & Environment at Axis commented, “Great quality shouldn’t be viewed as a by-product of the manufacturing process. Delivering high-performance, durable and resilient products starts with a dedication to quality from the outset. It should inform every decision and step of the production process, so that the end result reflects the company’s ongoing commitment. This is easier said than done, especially when dealing with a supply chain."

"That’s why Axis invests the time to evaluate, educate and support suppliers, to help them set and maintain the standards necessary to consistently deliver the best products for our customers and partners." Ensuring consistent quality depends on having transparent relationships with suppliers. These tend to be close and long-term, with open two-way communication and regular contact.

Preserve quality standards

Axis has a dedicated quality team who audit everything from process compliance - including documentation

Axis drives joint projects and development, sets targets and makes long-term mutual commitments and plans in partnership with its strategic suppliers. In this way, both parties have the opportunity to see how the other works, absorb any learnings and agree on processes together. Axis also has a dedicated quality team who audit everything from process compliance - including documentation - to supplier facilities and working practices.

This ensures that requirements for security, physical handling, inventory handling, production equipment, quality control, and traceability records are met. In addition, any problems can be identified and quickly rectified and preserve quality standards. A commitment to quality requires a significant resource investment, as well as an alignment of values between Axis and its suppliers.

A worthwhile investment

This is only achieved when every member of the supply chain shares the same dedication to maintaining standards universally. In addition, it’s important for Axis to constantly look for ways to improve processes and innovate where appropriate, thereby maintaining its reputation. As a result, each product will consistently meet or exceed customer expectations giving them confidence when it comes to performance and integrity.

Share with LinkedIn Share with Twitter Share with Facebook Share with Facebook
Download PDF version Download PDF version

In case you missed it

Water Plant Attack Emphasizes Cyber’s Impact On Physical Security
Water Plant Attack Emphasizes Cyber’s Impact On Physical Security

At an Oldsmar, Fla., water treatment facility on Feb. 5, an operator watched a computer screen as someone remotely accessed the system monitoring the water supply and increased the amount of sodium hydroxide from 100 parts per million to 11,100 parts per million. The chemical, also known as lye, is used in small concentrations to control acidity in the water. In larger concentrations, the compound is poisonous – the same corrosive chemical used to eat away at clogged drains. The impact of cybersecurity attacks The incident is the latest example of how cybersecurity attacks can translate into real-world, physical security consequences – even deadly ones.Cybersecurity attacks on small municipal water systems have been a concern among security professionals for years. The computer system was set up to allow remote access only to authorized users. The source of the unauthorized access is unknown. However, the attacker was only in the system for 3 to 5 minutes, and an operator corrected the concentration back to 100 parts per million soon after. It would have taken a day or more for contaminated water to enter the system. In the end, the city’s water supply was not affected. There were other safeguards in place that would have prevented contaminated water from entering the city’s water supply, which serves around 15,000 residents. The remote access used for the attack was disabled pending an investigation by the FBI, Secret Service and Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office. On Feb. 2, a compilation of breached usernames and passwords, known as COMB for “Compilation of Many Breaches,” was leaked online. COMB contains 3.2 billion unique email/password pairs. It was later discovered that the breach included the credentials for the Oldsmar water plant. Water plant attacks feared for years Cybersecurity attacks on small municipal water systems have been a concern among security professionals for years. Florida’s Sen. Marco Rubio tweeted that the attempt to poison the water supply should be treated as a “matter of national security.” “The incident at the Oldsmar water treatment plant is a reminder that our nation’s critical infrastructure is continually at risk; not only from nation-state attackers, but also from malicious actors with unknown motives and goals,” comments Mieng Lim, VP of Product Management at Digital Defense Inc., a provider of vulnerability management and threat assessment solutions.The attack on Oldsmar’s water treatment system shows how critical national infrastructure is increasingly becoming a target for hackers as organizations bring systems online “Our dependency on critical infrastructure – power grids, utilities, water supplies, communications, financial services, emergency services, etc. – on a daily basis emphasizes the need to ensure the systems are defended against any adversary,” Mieng Lim adds. “Proactive security measures are crucial to safeguard critical infrastructure systems when perimeter defenses have been compromised or circumvented. We have to get back to the basics – re-evaluate and rebuild security protections from the ground up.” "This event reinforces the increasing need to authenticate not only users, but the devices and machine identities that are authorized to connect to an organization's network,” adds Chris Hickman, Chief Security Officer at digital identity security vendor Keyfactor. “If your only line of protection is user authentication, it will be compromised. It's not necessarily about who connects to the system, but what that user can access once they're inside. "If the network could have authenticated the validity of the device connecting to the network, the connection would have failed because hackers rarely have possession of authorized devices. This and other cases of hijacked user credentials can be limited or mitigated if devices are issued strong, crypto-derived, unique credentials like a digital certificate. In this case, it looks like the network had trust in the user credential but not in the validity of the device itself. Unfortunately, this kind of scenario is what can happen when zero trust is your end state, not your beginning point." “The attack on Oldsmar’s water treatment system shows how critical national infrastructure is increasingly becoming a target for hackers as organizations bring systems online for the first time as part of digital transformation projects,” says Gareth Williams, Vice President - Secure Communications & Information Systems, Thales UK. “While the move towards greater automation and connected switches and control systems brings unprecedented opportunities, it is not without risk, as anything that is brought online immediately becomes a target to be hacked.” Operational technology to mitigate attacks Williams advises organizations to approach Operational Technology as its own entity and put in place procedures that mitigate against the impact of an attack that could ultimately cost lives. This means understanding what is connected, who has access to it and what else might be at risk should that system be compromised, he says. “Once that is established, they can secure access through protocols like access management and fail-safe systems.”  “The cyberattack against the water supply in Oldsmar should come as a wakeup call,” says Saryu Nayyar, CEO, Gurucul.  “Cybersecurity professionals have been talking about infrastructure vulnerabilities for years, detailing the potential for attacks like this, and this is a near perfect example of what we have been warning about,” she says.  Although this attack was not successful, there is little doubt a skilled attacker could execute a similar infrastructure attack with more destructive results, says Nayyar. Organizations tasked with operating and protecting critical public infrastructure must assume the worst and take more serious measures to protect their environments, she advises. Fortunately, there were backup systems in place in Oldsmar. What could have been a tragedy instead became a cautionary tale. Both physical security and cybersecurity professionals should pay attention.

What Are The Positive And Negative Effects Of COVID-19 To Security?
What Are The Positive And Negative Effects Of COVID-19 To Security?

The COVID-19 global pandemic had a life-changing impact on all of us in 2020, including a multi-faceted jolt on the physical security industry. With the benefit of hindsight, we can now see more clearly the exact nature and extent of that impact. And it’s not over yet: The pandemic will continue to be top-of-mind in 2021. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: What have been the positive and negative effects of Covid-19 on the physical security industry in 2020? What impact will it have on 2021?

Expert Roundup: Healthy Buildings, Blockchain, AI, Skilled Workers, And More
Expert Roundup: Healthy Buildings, Blockchain, AI, Skilled Workers, And More

Our Expert Panel Roundtable is an opinionated group. However, for a variety of reasons, we are sometimes guilty of not publishing their musings in a timely manner. At the end of 2020, we came across several interesting comments among those that were previously unpublished. Following is a catch-all collection of those responses, addressing some of the most current and important issues in the security marketplace in 2021.