Multi-layered security

Enterprises have typically focused on securing the network perimeter and relied on static passwords to authenticate users inside the firewall. This is insufficient, given the nature of today’s Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) and internal risks associated with Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) adoption. Static passwords can be a potential recipe for a security disaster. In this article Julian Lovelock, Vice President of Product Marketing, Identity Assurance HID Global explains that enterprises would benefit from not only employing strong authentication for remote access, but also extending its use to cover the desktop, key applications, servers, and cloud-based systems as part of a multi-layered security strategy.

Unfortunately, choosing an effective strong authentication solution for enterprise data protection has traditionally been difficult. Available solutions have been inadequate either in their security capabilities, the user experience they deliver, or in the cost and complexity to deploy them. Now, we have the opportunity to eliminate these problems using Near Field Communications (NFC)-enabled credentials that can reside on smart cards or smartphones, and can be employed to secure access to everything from doors, to data, to the cloud. Versatile, NFC-based strong authentication solutions can:

  • Support converged secure logical access to the network and cloud-based services and resources, as well as physical access to buildings, offices and other areas;
  • Support mobile security tokens for the most convenient and secure access from smartphones or tablets; and 
  • Deliver multifactor authentication capabilities for the most effective threat protection, as part of a multi-layered security strategy.

The Challenges of Strong Authentication

Multi-factor authentication, also known as strong authentication, combines something the user knows (such as a password) with something the user has (such as mobile and web tokens), and can also be extended to include a third factor in the form of something the user is (which can be ascertained through a biometric or behavior-metric solution).

Users have grown weary of the inconvenience of hardware OTPs, display cards and other physical devices for two-factor authentication. Additionally, OTPs are useful only for a limited range of applications. The industry is now replacing hardware OTPs with software tokens that can be held on such user devices as mobile phones, tablets, and browser-based tokens. With software OTPs, organizations are able to replace a dedicated security token with the user’s smartphone, enabling the two-factor authentication to grow in popularity and convenience. A phone app generates an OTP, or OTPs are sent to the phone via SMS. However, there are security vulnerabilities with software OTPs that have driven the need for a far more secure strong authentication alternative, such as smart cards based on the Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). The downside to this approach, however, is its high cost and level of complexity to deploy. 

Future Mobile Opportunities

The benefits of NFC technology are many as it becomes a standard feature of smart phones, tablets and laptops targeted at the enterprise market
NFC-based mobile model will deliver particularly robust security, and will be especially attractive in a BYOD environment

The benefits of NFC technology are many as it becomes a standard feature of smart phones, tablets and laptops targeted at the enterprise market. Users can have a smart card or smartphone that grants access to resources by simply “tapping in” – without the need to enter a password on touch-screen devices, or the need for additional devices to issue and manage. In addition, there are a number of steadily growing NFC-based tap-in use cases that are poised for strong adoption in the enterprise, including tap-in to facilities, VPNs, wireless networks, corporate Intranets, cloud- and web-based applications, and SSO clients, among many other scenarios. These benefits and the wide range of potential applications – along with the fact that manufacturers are enabling more and more phones, tablets and laptops with NFC -- are driving many companies to seriously consider incorporating secure NFC-based physical and logical access into their facilities and IT access strategies.

The mobile model will deliver particularly robust security, and will be especially attractive in a BYOD environment. It will be implemented within a trusted boundary, and use a secure communications channel for transferring identity information between validated phones, their secure elements (SEs), and other secure media and devices. The authentication credential will be stored on the mobile device’s secure element, and a cloud-based identity provisioning model will eliminate the risk of credential copying while making it easier to issue temporary credentials, cancel lost or stolen credentials, and monitor and modify security parameters when required. It will also be possible to combine mobile tokens with cloud app single-sign-on capabilities, blending classic two-factor authentication with streamlined access to multiple cloud apps on a single device that users rarely lose or forget.

The NFC tap-in strong authentication model will not only eliminate the problems of earlier solutions, it will also offer the opportunity to achieve true convergence through a single solution that can be used to access IT resources while also enabling many other applications. These include such physical access control applications as time-and-attendance, secure-print-management, cashless vending, building automation, and biometric templates for additional factors of authentication – all delivered on the same smart card or NFC-enabled phone alongside OTPs, eliminating the need to carry additional tokens or devices. Historically, physical and logical access control functions were mutually exclusive within an organization, and each was managed by different groups. Now, however, the lines between these groups will begin to blur.

Additional Considerations for the Cloud

As BYOD continues to grow in popularity and many cloud-based applications are accessed from personal devices, enterprises will need to take a layered approach to security
Enterprises would benefit from employing strong authentication for cloud-based systems as part of a multi-layered security strategy

As identity management moves to the cloud and enterprises take advantage of the Software as a Service (SaaS) model, there are other critical elements to consider. For instance, it will be critical to resolve challenges around provisioning and revoking user identities across multiple cloud-based applications, while also enabling secure, hassle-free user login to those applications.

The most effective approach for addressing data moving to the cloud will likely be federated identity management, which allows users to access multiple applications by authenticating to a central portal. It also will be critical to ensure the personal privacy of BYOD users, while protecting the integrity of enterprise data and resources. Several other security issues also emerge. IT departments won’t have the same level of control over BYODs or the potentially untrustworthy personal apps they may carry, and aren’t likely to be loading a standard image onto BYODs with anti-virus and other protective software. Nor is it likely that organizations will be able to retrieve devices when employees leave. We will need to find new and innovative ways to address these and other challenges. Notwithstanding the risks, the use of mobile phones equipped with SEs, or equivalent protected containers, opens opportunities for powerful new authentication models that leverage the phone as a secure portable credential store, enabling use cases ranging from tap-in strong authentication for remote data access, to entering a building or apartment.

Additionally, as BYOD continues to grow in popularity and many cloud-based applications are accessed from personal devices, enterprises will need to take a layered approach to security, recognizing that no single authentication method is going to address the multiple devices and multiple use cases required by today’s mobile enterprise.

A Layered Security Approach

In addition to multi-factor user authentication as the first layer of security, both inside the firewall and in the cloud, there are four other layers that should be implemented.

The second layer is device authentication. In other words, once it is determined that the user is who he or she says she is, it is important to verify that the person is using a “known” device. For this step, it is important to combine endpoint device identification and profiling with such elements as proxy detection and geo-location.

The third layer is ensuring that the user’s browser is part of a secure communication channel. Browser protection can be implemented through simple passive malware detection, but this does not result in the strongest possible endpoint security. It is more effective to use a proactive hardened browser with mutual secure socket layer connection to the application. 

Migration to NFC-based strong
authentication and true converged
solutions requires an extensible
and adaptable multi-technology
smart card and reader platform

The fourth layer is transaction authentication/pattern-based intelligence, which increases security for particularly sensitive transactions. A transaction authentication layer can include Out-Of-Band (OOB) transaction verification, transaction signing for non-repudiation, transaction monitoring, and behavioral analysis. 

The final layer is application security, which protects applications on mobile devices that are used to deliver sensitive information. The application must be architecturally hardened and capable of executing mutual authentication. Adding this layer makes data theft much more complex and costly for hackers.

Effectively implementing these five security layers requires an integrated versatile authentication platform with real-time threat detection capabilities. Used in online banking and ecommerce for some time, threat detection technology is expected to cross over into the corporate sector as a way to provide an additional layer of security for remote access use cases such as VPNs or Virtual Desktops.

Migrating to New Capabilities

Migration to NFC-based strong authentication and true converged solutions requires an extensible and adaptable multi-technology smart card and reader platform. For optimal flexibility and interoperability, this platform should be based on open architecture, and enable both legacy credential and new credential technology to be combined on the same card while also supporting NFC-enabled mobile platforms. To meet security requirements, the platform should use contactless high frequency smart card technology that features mutual authentication and cryptographic protection mechanisms with secret keys, and employs a secure messaging protocol that is delivered on a trust-based communication platform within a secure ecosystem of interoperable products. 

With these capabilities, organizations can ensure the highest level of security, convenience, and interoperability on either cards or phones, along with the adaptability to meet tomorrow’s requirements including a combination of both strong authentication for protecting the data and applications in the cloud, and contactless high-frequency smart card capabilities for diverse physical access control applications. 

With proper planning, organizations can solve the strong authentication challenge while extending their solutions to protect everything from the cloud and desktop to the door. These converged solutions reduce deployment and operational costs by enabling organizations to leverage their existing physical access control credential investment to seamlessly add logical access control for network log-on. The result is a fully interoperable, multi-layered security solution across company networks, systems and facilities.

Share with LinkedIn Share with Twitter Share with Facebook Share with Facebook
Download PDF version Download PDF version

Author profile

Julian Lovelock Vice President, Strategic Innovation, HID Global

In case you missed it

What Is The Impact Of Remote Working On Security?
What Is The Impact Of Remote Working On Security?

During the coronavirus lockdown, employees worked from home in record numbers. But the growing trend came with a new set of security challenges. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: What is the impact of the transition to remote working/home offices on the security market?

Water Plant Attack Emphasizes Cyber’s Impact On Physical Security
Water Plant Attack Emphasizes Cyber’s Impact On Physical Security

At an Oldsmar, Fla., water treatment facility on Feb. 5, an operator watched a computer screen as someone remotely accessed the system monitoring the water supply and increased the amount of sodium hydroxide from 100 parts per million to 11,100 parts per million. The chemical, also known as lye, is used in small concentrations to control acidity in the water. In larger concentrations, the compound is poisonous – the same corrosive chemical used to eat away at clogged drains. The impact of cybersecurity attacks The incident is the latest example of how cybersecurity attacks can translate into real-world, physical security consequences – even deadly ones.Cybersecurity attacks on small municipal water systems have been a concern among security professionals for years. The computer system was set up to allow remote access only to authorized users. The source of the unauthorized access is unknown. However, the attacker was only in the system for 3 to 5 minutes, and an operator corrected the concentration back to 100 parts per million soon after. It would have taken a day or more for contaminated water to enter the system. In the end, the city’s water supply was not affected. There were other safeguards in place that would have prevented contaminated water from entering the city’s water supply, which serves around 15,000 residents. The remote access used for the attack was disabled pending an investigation by the FBI, Secret Service and Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office. On Feb. 2, a compilation of breached usernames and passwords, known as COMB for “Compilation of Many Breaches,” was leaked online. COMB contains 3.2 billion unique email/password pairs. It was later discovered that the breach included the credentials for the Oldsmar water plant. Water plant attacks feared for years Cybersecurity attacks on small municipal water systems have been a concern among security professionals for years. Florida’s Sen. Marco Rubio tweeted that the attempt to poison the water supply should be treated as a “matter of national security.” “The incident at the Oldsmar water treatment plant is a reminder that our nation’s critical infrastructure is continually at risk; not only from nation-state attackers, but also from malicious actors with unknown motives and goals,” comments Mieng Lim, VP of Product Management at Digital Defense Inc., a provider of vulnerability management and threat assessment solutions.The attack on Oldsmar’s water treatment system shows how critical national infrastructure is increasingly becoming a target for hackers as organizations bring systems online “Our dependency on critical infrastructure – power grids, utilities, water supplies, communications, financial services, emergency services, etc. – on a daily basis emphasizes the need to ensure the systems are defended against any adversary,” Mieng Lim adds. “Proactive security measures are crucial to safeguard critical infrastructure systems when perimeter defenses have been compromised or circumvented. We have to get back to the basics – re-evaluate and rebuild security protections from the ground up.” "This event reinforces the increasing need to authenticate not only users, but the devices and machine identities that are authorized to connect to an organization's network,” adds Chris Hickman, Chief Security Officer at digital identity security vendor Keyfactor. “If your only line of protection is user authentication, it will be compromised. It's not necessarily about who connects to the system, but what that user can access once they're inside. "If the network could have authenticated the validity of the device connecting to the network, the connection would have failed because hackers rarely have possession of authorized devices. This and other cases of hijacked user credentials can be limited or mitigated if devices are issued strong, crypto-derived, unique credentials like a digital certificate. In this case, it looks like the network had trust in the user credential but not in the validity of the device itself. Unfortunately, this kind of scenario is what can happen when zero trust is your end state, not your beginning point." “The attack on Oldsmar’s water treatment system shows how critical national infrastructure is increasingly becoming a target for hackers as organizations bring systems online for the first time as part of digital transformation projects,” says Gareth Williams, Vice President - Secure Communications & Information Systems, Thales UK. “While the move towards greater automation and connected switches and control systems brings unprecedented opportunities, it is not without risk, as anything that is brought online immediately becomes a target to be hacked.” Operational technology to mitigate attacks Williams advises organizations to approach Operational Technology as its own entity and put in place procedures that mitigate against the impact of an attack that could ultimately cost lives. This means understanding what is connected, who has access to it and what else might be at risk should that system be compromised, he says. “Once that is established, they can secure access through protocols like access management and fail-safe systems.”  “The cyberattack against the water supply in Oldsmar should come as a wakeup call,” says Saryu Nayyar, CEO, Gurucul.  “Cybersecurity professionals have been talking about infrastructure vulnerabilities for years, detailing the potential for attacks like this, and this is a near perfect example of what we have been warning about,” she says.  Although this attack was not successful, there is little doubt a skilled attacker could execute a similar infrastructure attack with more destructive results, says Nayyar. Organizations tasked with operating and protecting critical public infrastructure must assume the worst and take more serious measures to protect their environments, she advises. Fortunately, there were backup systems in place in Oldsmar. What could have been a tragedy instead became a cautionary tale. Both physical security and cybersecurity professionals should pay attention.

How Have Security Solutions Failed Our Schools?
How Have Security Solutions Failed Our Schools?

School shootings are a high-profile reminder of the need for the highest levels of security at our schools and education facilities. Increasingly, a remedy to boost the security at schools is to use more technology. However, no technology is a panacea, and ongoing violence and other threats at our schools suggest some level of failure. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: How have security solutions failed our schools and what is the solution?