IdentiSys Inc. has been named one of the Top 150 Workplaces in Minnesota by the Star Tribune and was published in the Star Tribune Top Workplaces special section on Sunday, June 16.
Produced by the same team that compiles the 28-year-old Star Tribune 100 report of the best-performing public companies in Minnesota, Top Workplaces recognizes the most progressive companies in Minnesota based on employee opinions measuring engagement, organizational health and satisfaction. The analysis included responses from over 140,000 employees at Minnesota public, private and non-profit organizations.
Employee engagement and retention
The rankings in the Star Tribune Top 150 Workplaces are based on survey information collected by Energage, an independent company specializing in employee engagement and retention. IdentiSys was ranked 32 out of 70 on the small company list.
Very few companies make this list ever and this is our sixth year in a row obtaining Top Workplace honours"
“It is a huge honor to be among the best of the best in Minnesota. And, even more important is that our employees feel this way about the company and what we do” said Mike Shields II president and CEO of IdentiSys. “Very few companies make this list ever and this is our sixth year in a row obtaining Top Workplace honors. I am so proud to lead this organization and know that we have the best colleagues to support our business and the focus we place on customer satisfaction.”
Best work environments
“Our growth strategy for the past 20 years has always been dependent on the services our employees provide daily and we believe this is the key to our continued business success.”
Star Tribune Publisher Michael J. Klingensmith said, “The companies in the Star Tribune Top 150 Workplaces deserve high praise for creating the very best work environments in the state of Minnesota. My congratulations to each of these exceptional companies.” To qualify for the Star Tribune Top Workplaces, a company must have more than 50 employees in Minnesota. Over 2,000 companies were invited to participate. Rankings were composite scores calculated purely on the basis of employee responses.
