How often have you been caught in the midst of animated chatter and swept up in the anticipation of "the next big thing in X", only to look back and think it was all overhyped?
It happens everywhere and with everything, from pop culture movies and new budding artists, to aspects in professional industries such as new consumer products and technology. The security industry certainly has its share of overhyped technology. We asked some of our Panellists on their thoughts on what security technologies they think have been the most overhyped in the last five years. Let's take a look at what some of them had to say.
A few years ago, a number of providers put great emphasis on iris recognition as the up-and-coming biometric solution for secure access technology. Whilst it is a great concept and can provide high levels of accuracy, the early incarnations ultimately proved to be user-unfriendly and troublesome – proving to be a headache for operators and the manufacturers and installers selling them. However with reworked algorithms and improved cameras technologies, iris recognition is finally making progress in the market again. The moral of the story is to be mindful of user interaction and adoption of a fledgling technology before pushing it to the market, if you want to gain traction and build volume.
Unfortunately, the security industry's marketing engine can run faster than its technology engine, especially in the early days before technologies have been refined and tested. Early claims about the capabilities and applicability of video analytics, for example, far outpaced their early performance, plagued by false alarms and complex configuration challenges. Facial recognition, especially, was over-hyped for use in uncontrolled, face-in-the-crowd environments. You would also have to say that physical security information management (PSIM) systems were overhyped as a cure-all for the broader market when their usefulness is more targeted. Recently, the capabilities of cloud-based video systems have been overstated before the infrastructure was in place to make them viable except for small installations. Finally, near-field communication (NFC) has failed to catch on for access control despite extensive marketing hype. Customers disappointed after being drawn in by the hype (or who hear stories) are then hesitant to invest after the technologies have matured and offer real benefits.
H.265 video compression has been overhyped and is still a non-factor in physical security as only a few camera manufacturers are even supporting this mode of video compression today with released product. The one IP camera company that is heavily marketing H.265 as their distinctive competence in the vast sea of IP camera suppliers is Aventura. The adoption of H.265 by the major IP camera manufactures such as Sony and Axis will continue to be monitored and we will see more companies join Aventura in 2015 with H.265 based IP Cameras. However, with almost no push from the major IP camera manufacturers to support the H.265 video compression you have little to no demand for video management software companies to move to support the H.265 video compression. Thus, as of today H.265 has been overhyped and under-delivered.