At the end of last year, we anticipated that data gathering and analysis would continue to be a strong trend, and that certainly proved to be the case in 2016.


More and more organizations are seeing the value of the intelligence provided by diverse systems’ data. The number and variety of networked systems and devices – both security and non-security – continued to grow steadily in the last year, and the data these disparate sources create has proven highly useful in identifying statistical patterns and trends that may indicate the likelihood of incidents occurring. More data leads to more complete intelligence, allowing organizations to more easily identify threats or business opportunities, make more informed decisions and create better outcomes in general.

Another key trend we anticipated in 2016 was the growth of security as a critical component in an organization. This also proved to be the case in the last year, as the role of security teams continued to take on more relevance related to overall operations. This has largely been possible thanks to the ready availability of strong tools and solutions that allow security departments to lower costs, increase compliance and reduce the risk of insider threat. 

Identifying Insider Threats

Increased adoption of predictive analysis to identify potential threats and opportunities will continue to be a strong trend in 2017, as will the transformation of security from reactive cost center to proactive business partner. Additionally, the coming year will see even greater emphasis on the convergence of physical and cyber security, which should come as no surprise given the ever-increasing number and sophistication of cyberattacks we have seen in recent months.

Nearly every organization’s business strategy includes the critical need to secure networks and digital assets with technologies that apply intelligence to their infrastructures to detect vulnerabilities and improve network security. While these are vital measures, they overlook the role of physical security in protecting digital assets. Consider that many data breaches are actually perpetrated by individuals from within an organization who are authorized to access sensitive areas of networks or facilities. Many other data breaches are the result of physical break-ins to steal a laptop or backup server.

Organizations are beginning to understand the need for strong physical security and identity management to complement cybersecurity programs. In considering solutions to bridge the gap between the two, many find that the most effective practices are those that include physical and logical security working in tandem to thwart data breaches from inside and outside of an organization. There is still a long way to go in making organizations aware of this reality, but we anticipate that education will expand awareness in the coming year.

Another key trend in the security industry for the last several years is mobile capability
Mobile PIAM solutions offer the ability to connect systems that use mobile devices, access control and offline locks

Increasing Mobile Capability

Another key trend in the security industry for the last several years is mobile capability, which will see even broader and deeper adoption and integration in 2017. A main area of growth will be mobile PIAM (physical identity and access management), which allows organizations to extend their infrastructure to areas that may otherwise be difficult or time-consuming to secure. These include locations such as outdoor or temporary venues, where deploying a traditional solution would be cost-prohibitive and where identity is often verified by consulting physical lists and checking photo IDs.

Mobile PIAM solutions offer the ability to connect systems that use mobile devices, access control and offline locks to deliver strong identity authentication, allowing organizations to more easily control access and extend control wherever there is a need. Given the flexibility, ease of use, effectiveness and cost savings these mobile PIAM solutions, will likely see steady growth in terms of both maturity and adoption in the coming year. 

Closing Out Another Strong Year

Following up on a strong 2015, Quantum Secure experienced another high-growth year in 2016. Since becoming part of HID Global in 2015, we have seen a rise in the volume and range of opportunities to deploy SAFE software solutions. Most notable was Quantum Secure’s involvement in the recent International Sporting Event held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, where SAFE Sports and Events Manager was deployed to manage and track the identities of approximately 500,000 credentialed individuals to reduce the risk of unauthorized intrusions and prevent potential threats. Using a mobile app, security staff were able to quickly and effectively validate individuals by simply swiping their credentials on handheld peripherals, while also performing an on-site visual verification via a workstation and/or mobile device.

Quantum Secure has led the way in software for identity management, compliance and access provisioning within physical security infrastructures, and we will continue our tradition of innovation in 2017 and beyond. We are continually looking to expand our SAFE portfolio to deliver solutions that simply physical identity and access management and generate actionable intelligence that can identify and eliminate potential risk for growing number of vertical markets and applications.

See the full coverage of 2016/2017 Review and Forecast articles here



Share with LinkedIn Share with Twitter Share with Facebook Share with Facebook
Download PDF version Download PDF version

Author profile

Don Campbell Director of Product Management, Quantum Secure, Inc

In case you missed it

What Is The Impact Of Remote Working On Security?
What Is The Impact Of Remote Working On Security?

During the coronavirus lockdown, employees worked from home in record numbers. But the growing trend came with a new set of security challenges. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: What is the impact of the transition to remote working/home offices on the security market?

Water Plant Attack Emphasizes Cyber’s Impact On Physical Security
Water Plant Attack Emphasizes Cyber’s Impact On Physical Security

At an Oldsmar, Fla., water treatment facility on Feb. 5, an operator watched a computer screen as someone remotely accessed the system monitoring the water supply and increased the amount of sodium hydroxide from 100 parts per million to 11,100 parts per million. The chemical, also known as lye, is used in small concentrations to control acidity in the water. In larger concentrations, the compound is poisonous – the same corrosive chemical used to eat away at clogged drains. The impact of cybersecurity attacks The incident is the latest example of how cybersecurity attacks can translate into real-world, physical security consequences – even deadly ones.Cybersecurity attacks on small municipal water systems have been a concern among security professionals for years. The computer system was set up to allow remote access only to authorized users. The source of the unauthorized access is unknown. However, the attacker was only in the system for 3 to 5 minutes, and an operator corrected the concentration back to 100 parts per million soon after. It would have taken a day or more for contaminated water to enter the system. In the end, the city’s water supply was not affected. There were other safeguards in place that would have prevented contaminated water from entering the city’s water supply, which serves around 15,000 residents. The remote access used for the attack was disabled pending an investigation by the FBI, Secret Service and Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office. On Feb. 2, a compilation of breached usernames and passwords, known as COMB for “Compilation of Many Breaches,” was leaked online. COMB contains 3.2 billion unique email/password pairs. It was later discovered that the breach included the credentials for the Oldsmar water plant. Water plant attacks feared for years Cybersecurity attacks on small municipal water systems have been a concern among security professionals for years. Florida’s Sen. Marco Rubio tweeted that the attempt to poison the water supply should be treated as a “matter of national security.” “The incident at the Oldsmar water treatment plant is a reminder that our nation’s critical infrastructure is continually at risk; not only from nation-state attackers, but also from malicious actors with unknown motives and goals,” comments Mieng Lim, VP of Product Management at Digital Defense Inc., a provider of vulnerability management and threat assessment solutions.The attack on Oldsmar’s water treatment system shows how critical national infrastructure is increasingly becoming a target for hackers as organizations bring systems online “Our dependency on critical infrastructure – power grids, utilities, water supplies, communications, financial services, emergency services, etc. – on a daily basis emphasizes the need to ensure the systems are defended against any adversary,” Mieng Lim adds. “Proactive security measures are crucial to safeguard critical infrastructure systems when perimeter defenses have been compromised or circumvented. We have to get back to the basics – re-evaluate and rebuild security protections from the ground up.” "This event reinforces the increasing need to authenticate not only users, but the devices and machine identities that are authorized to connect to an organization's network,” adds Chris Hickman, Chief Security Officer at digital identity security vendor Keyfactor. “If your only line of protection is user authentication, it will be compromised. It's not necessarily about who connects to the system, but what that user can access once they're inside. "If the network could have authenticated the validity of the device connecting to the network, the connection would have failed because hackers rarely have possession of authorized devices. This and other cases of hijacked user credentials can be limited or mitigated if devices are issued strong, crypto-derived, unique credentials like a digital certificate. In this case, it looks like the network had trust in the user credential but not in the validity of the device itself. Unfortunately, this kind of scenario is what can happen when zero trust is your end state, not your beginning point." “The attack on Oldsmar’s water treatment system shows how critical national infrastructure is increasingly becoming a target for hackers as organizations bring systems online for the first time as part of digital transformation projects,” says Gareth Williams, Vice President - Secure Communications & Information Systems, Thales UK. “While the move towards greater automation and connected switches and control systems brings unprecedented opportunities, it is not without risk, as anything that is brought online immediately becomes a target to be hacked.” Operational technology to mitigate attacks Williams advises organizations to approach Operational Technology as its own entity and put in place procedures that mitigate against the impact of an attack that could ultimately cost lives. This means understanding what is connected, who has access to it and what else might be at risk should that system be compromised, he says. “Once that is established, they can secure access through protocols like access management and fail-safe systems.”  “The cyberattack against the water supply in Oldsmar should come as a wakeup call,” says Saryu Nayyar, CEO, Gurucul.  “Cybersecurity professionals have been talking about infrastructure vulnerabilities for years, detailing the potential for attacks like this, and this is a near perfect example of what we have been warning about,” she says.  Although this attack was not successful, there is little doubt a skilled attacker could execute a similar infrastructure attack with more destructive results, says Nayyar. Organizations tasked with operating and protecting critical public infrastructure must assume the worst and take more serious measures to protect their environments, she advises. Fortunately, there were backup systems in place in Oldsmar. What could have been a tragedy instead became a cautionary tale. Both physical security and cybersecurity professionals should pay attention.

How Have Security Solutions Failed Our Schools?
How Have Security Solutions Failed Our Schools?

School shootings are a high-profile reminder of the need for the highest levels of security at our schools and education facilities. Increasingly, a remedy to boost the security at schools is to use more technology. However, no technology is a panacea, and ongoing violence and other threats at our schools suggest some level of failure. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: How have security solutions failed our schools and what is the solution?