IP video cameras have been available for about 20 years, and many end-users have converted
Access control and alarm worlds are going digital and plugging into the network

Open tech standards are integrating diverse security technology systems — and security people — into the corporate mainstream

The digital technology revolution has begun to course through the public and private worlds of government and commerce, replacing old analog technology. Chief among the many benefits of digital over analog is the ability to integrate diverse technologies into single powerful — and often less redundant and less expensive systems.

Beneficiaries of the digital revolution include end-users of security — security departments and facility directors responsible for security at large and small companies and institutions.

“In the past, many different systems — access control, intrusion alarms, video surveillance and other systems — all sent data to central security locations, but each had to be monitored from separate work stations,” says J. Kelly Stewart, managing principal and CSO with Leesburg, Va.-based Newcastle Consulting, LLC.

All that is changing now, continues Stewart. IP video cameras have been available for about 20 years, and many end-users have converted. Many more plan to convert as they refresh their camera equipment.

Current improvements include digital megapixel cameras that collect and store tremendously detailed video that users can zoom in on from the control panel without the need for a zoom lens. IP cameras simply connect to nodes on ubiquitous network cabling, vastly simplifying installation.

Integration and return on investment

The big digital news is that the access control and alarm worlds are now going digital and plugging into the network. Once on the network, physical security information management (PSIM) systems can integrate all security systems onto a single user interface.

"Open standard security technology also makes it
possible to integrate security technology with other building systems"

“This also goes to cost,” Stewart adds. “While some integration systems cost hundreds of thousands, newer systems now offer true integration at an affordable cost.”

Open standard security technology also makes it possible to integrate security technology with other building systems and corporate needs to begin to make a meaningful return on the investment in security technology.

For example, the access control system can communicate with the lighting and heating, ventilating and air-conditioning system and turn on the lights and heat — or air-conditioning — for employees that need to work in their offices at night or over a weekend.

Equally important, security technology can begin to perform corporate tasks. Video and access control systems can count customer traffic in stores and malls, identify long lines in, say, airport security stations, and alert officials to the need for additional stations.

Integrating security people

New technical capabilities plus the difficulties and risks at large in the modern world have led to another kind of integration: security professionals have been integrated into C-suite discussions across the corporate world.

“Security has never been at the table in the past,” says Stewart. “Today, security is gaining a seat at the table to advise on risk management, safety and security.

"Current improvements include digital megapixel cameras that collect and store tremendously detailed video that users can zoom in on from the control panel"

“Company security directors are less and less the old ‘guns, guards and gates’ people and more and more chief risk management officers. Corporate officials have come to see that physical and logical security touches every department in the corporation.”

For instance, a Human Resources department faces a number of risks in the areas such as privacy and workplace violence. “Of course, only the people within the departments will understand their risks completely, so the security team needs their information for a strategy for particular departments and the overall corporation,” Stewart says.

In short, digital technology is changing the nature of the security conversation for end-users. The old conversation aimed to work out problems created by the inability of proprietary technologies to integrate into a single system.

Digital technology has made technological integration a foregone, no-hassle conclusion. The conversation today is among corporate departments, C-Suites and security professionals. It aims to identify and mitigate risks to people, property, business continuity and other corporate activities.

And that’s the way it should be.

Share with LinkedIn Share with Twitter Share with Facebook Share with Facebook
Download PDF version Download PDF version

Author profile

Michael Fickes End User Correspondent, SecurityInformed.com

In case you missed it

What Is The Impact Of Remote Working On Security?
What Is The Impact Of Remote Working On Security?

During the coronavirus lockdown, employees worked from home in record numbers. But the growing trend came with a new set of security challenges. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: What is the impact of the transition to remote working/home offices on the security market?

Water Plant Attack Emphasizes Cyber’s Impact On Physical Security
Water Plant Attack Emphasizes Cyber’s Impact On Physical Security

At an Oldsmar, Fla., water treatment facility on Feb. 5, an operator watched a computer screen as someone remotely accessed the system monitoring the water supply and increased the amount of sodium hydroxide from 100 parts per million to 11,100 parts per million. The chemical, also known as lye, is used in small concentrations to control acidity in the water. In larger concentrations, the compound is poisonous – the same corrosive chemical used to eat away at clogged drains. The impact of cybersecurity attacks The incident is the latest example of how cybersecurity attacks can translate into real-world, physical security consequences – even deadly ones.Cybersecurity attacks on small municipal water systems have been a concern among security professionals for years. The computer system was set up to allow remote access only to authorized users. The source of the unauthorized access is unknown. However, the attacker was only in the system for 3 to 5 minutes, and an operator corrected the concentration back to 100 parts per million soon after. It would have taken a day or more for contaminated water to enter the system. In the end, the city’s water supply was not affected. There were other safeguards in place that would have prevented contaminated water from entering the city’s water supply, which serves around 15,000 residents. The remote access used for the attack was disabled pending an investigation by the FBI, Secret Service and Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office. On Feb. 2, a compilation of breached usernames and passwords, known as COMB for “Compilation of Many Breaches,” was leaked online. COMB contains 3.2 billion unique email/password pairs. It was later discovered that the breach included the credentials for the Oldsmar water plant. Water plant attacks feared for years Cybersecurity attacks on small municipal water systems have been a concern among security professionals for years. Florida’s Sen. Marco Rubio tweeted that the attempt to poison the water supply should be treated as a “matter of national security.” “The incident at the Oldsmar water treatment plant is a reminder that our nation’s critical infrastructure is continually at risk; not only from nation-state attackers, but also from malicious actors with unknown motives and goals,” comments Mieng Lim, VP of Product Management at Digital Defense Inc., a provider of vulnerability management and threat assessment solutions.The attack on Oldsmar’s water treatment system shows how critical national infrastructure is increasingly becoming a target for hackers as organizations bring systems online “Our dependency on critical infrastructure – power grids, utilities, water supplies, communications, financial services, emergency services, etc. – on a daily basis emphasizes the need to ensure the systems are defended against any adversary,” Mieng Lim adds. “Proactive security measures are crucial to safeguard critical infrastructure systems when perimeter defenses have been compromised or circumvented. We have to get back to the basics – re-evaluate and rebuild security protections from the ground up.” "This event reinforces the increasing need to authenticate not only users, but the devices and machine identities that are authorized to connect to an organization's network,” adds Chris Hickman, Chief Security Officer at digital identity security vendor Keyfactor. “If your only line of protection is user authentication, it will be compromised. It's not necessarily about who connects to the system, but what that user can access once they're inside. "If the network could have authenticated the validity of the device connecting to the network, the connection would have failed because hackers rarely have possession of authorized devices. This and other cases of hijacked user credentials can be limited or mitigated if devices are issued strong, crypto-derived, unique credentials like a digital certificate. In this case, it looks like the network had trust in the user credential but not in the validity of the device itself. Unfortunately, this kind of scenario is what can happen when zero trust is your end state, not your beginning point." “The attack on Oldsmar’s water treatment system shows how critical national infrastructure is increasingly becoming a target for hackers as organizations bring systems online for the first time as part of digital transformation projects,” says Gareth Williams, Vice President - Secure Communications & Information Systems, Thales UK. “While the move towards greater automation and connected switches and control systems brings unprecedented opportunities, it is not without risk, as anything that is brought online immediately becomes a target to be hacked.” Operational technology to mitigate attacks Williams advises organizations to approach Operational Technology as its own entity and put in place procedures that mitigate against the impact of an attack that could ultimately cost lives. This means understanding what is connected, who has access to it and what else might be at risk should that system be compromised, he says. “Once that is established, they can secure access through protocols like access management and fail-safe systems.”  “The cyberattack against the water supply in Oldsmar should come as a wakeup call,” says Saryu Nayyar, CEO, Gurucul.  “Cybersecurity professionals have been talking about infrastructure vulnerabilities for years, detailing the potential for attacks like this, and this is a near perfect example of what we have been warning about,” she says.  Although this attack was not successful, there is little doubt a skilled attacker could execute a similar infrastructure attack with more destructive results, says Nayyar. Organizations tasked with operating and protecting critical public infrastructure must assume the worst and take more serious measures to protect their environments, she advises. Fortunately, there were backup systems in place in Oldsmar. What could have been a tragedy instead became a cautionary tale. Both physical security and cybersecurity professionals should pay attention.

How Have Security Solutions Failed Our Schools?
How Have Security Solutions Failed Our Schools?

School shootings are a high-profile reminder of the need for the highest levels of security at our schools and education facilities. Increasingly, a remedy to boost the security at schools is to use more technology. However, no technology is a panacea, and ongoing violence and other threats at our schools suggest some level of failure. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: How have security solutions failed our schools and what is the solution?