This scenario is actually providing a new opportunity for progressive systems integration companies such as Livewire LLC, Richmond, Va
ISPs are often under-delivering on promised
network
speeds and bandwidth
Regardless of where you stand on net neutrality, there’s a bigger slice to the story – how to monitor the health and performance of a network to ensure system performance.

While an Internet fast lane for everyone makes sense, the reality is that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are often under-delivering on promised network speeds and bandwidth. And while the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will likely delay net neutrality rules until next year, the effect ISPs have over streaming media and bandwidth speeds is already being seen in choppy service, especially with video entertainment applications. This scenario is actually providing a new opportunity for progressive systems integration companies such as Livewire LLC, Richmond, Va.

“What we are finding is that promises of network speeds differ versus actual delivery. Remote monitoring gives us the ‘trust but verify’ information we need to assist customers,” says Henry Clifford, president of Livewire.

The FCC is seeking to keep the Internet free and open, and to ensure that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source. The latest on net neutrality is that on Nov. 10 President Barack Obama asked the FCC in its proposed regulations to set strict rules for ISPs and regulate them like public utilities. And, of course, there was outcry from behemoths such as Time Warner Cable and Comcast, whose stock share prices took a hit.

So it’s back to the drawing board for the FCC, which has already been working on new net neutrality regulations after courts struck down previous efforts intended to prevent ISPs from discriminating against web sites and other online content. Without such protection, regulators fear companies that deliver Internet connections to consumers will be able to block new services and bypass innovation, even “throttle” or control the speed of connections.

What’s Really Happening With Network Connectivity?

InVision provides 24/7 network monitoring and most often eliminates the need for on-site service calls
Livewire has been offering customers the InVision network monitoring product from ihiji

“We get complaints that customers with Netflix streaming media, for example, are having ‘fuzzy’ reception,” says Clifford. “Not all bandwidth is equal anymore, so it’s an education process with our customers. At the end of the education, the frustration doesn’t change, but it’s our job as integrators to keep customers in the loop with what’s going on. I think some of the bandwidth ‘throttling’ is short term, and new deals will go through that will result in the ability for the network to handle higher speeds consistently,” he says. Clifford says video streaming is the biggest issue, and that’s where customers feel the most pain.

Livewire has been offering customers the InVision network monitoring product from ihiji, a black box designed to remotely and proactively monitor the health and performance of network and audio-video (AV) systems. InVision provides 24/7 network monitoring and most often eliminates the need for on-site service calls. InVision can remotely re-boot installed equipment and apply updates on a regular basis. It also provides information on the condition and frequency of ISP uptime, slow Internet connections, or latency and intermittent Internet disconnects (packet loss). He charges $49.99 a month for 24/7 system monitoring and unlimited remote support.

“The reports from InVision give us a high level look at upload and download speeds so we can figure out if it’s a network issue or a service provider issue,” says Clifford. “We want to make sure the customer is getting what they are paying for. Anytime we can offer information to the customer, it gives them peace of mind and lets them know we are on the job. It really helps cement the relationship with the customer and build our credibility.”

Share with LinkedIn Share with Twitter Share with Facebook Share with Facebook
Download PDF version Download PDF version

Author profile

Deborah O'Mara Owner, DLO Communications

Deborah L. O’Mara, SourceSecurity.com's dealer/integrator correspondent, is a veteran of the security marketplace, having extensive experience in security, fire alarm technology and integrated systems.

In case you missed it

What Is The Impact Of Remote Working On Security?
What Is The Impact Of Remote Working On Security?

During the coronavirus lockdown, employees worked from home in record numbers. But the growing trend came with a new set of security challenges. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: What is the impact of the transition to remote working/home offices on the security market?

Water Plant Attack Emphasizes Cyber’s Impact On Physical Security
Water Plant Attack Emphasizes Cyber’s Impact On Physical Security

At an Oldsmar, Fla., water treatment facility on Feb. 5, an operator watched a computer screen as someone remotely accessed the system monitoring the water supply and increased the amount of sodium hydroxide from 100 parts per million to 11,100 parts per million. The chemical, also known as lye, is used in small concentrations to control acidity in the water. In larger concentrations, the compound is poisonous – the same corrosive chemical used to eat away at clogged drains. The impact of cybersecurity attacks The incident is the latest example of how cybersecurity attacks can translate into real-world, physical security consequences – even deadly ones.Cybersecurity attacks on small municipal water systems have been a concern among security professionals for years. The computer system was set up to allow remote access only to authorized users. The source of the unauthorized access is unknown. However, the attacker was only in the system for 3 to 5 minutes, and an operator corrected the concentration back to 100 parts per million soon after. It would have taken a day or more for contaminated water to enter the system. In the end, the city’s water supply was not affected. There were other safeguards in place that would have prevented contaminated water from entering the city’s water supply, which serves around 15,000 residents. The remote access used for the attack was disabled pending an investigation by the FBI, Secret Service and Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office. On Feb. 2, a compilation of breached usernames and passwords, known as COMB for “Compilation of Many Breaches,” was leaked online. COMB contains 3.2 billion unique email/password pairs. It was later discovered that the breach included the credentials for the Oldsmar water plant. Water plant attacks feared for years Cybersecurity attacks on small municipal water systems have been a concern among security professionals for years. Florida’s Sen. Marco Rubio tweeted that the attempt to poison the water supply should be treated as a “matter of national security.” “The incident at the Oldsmar water treatment plant is a reminder that our nation’s critical infrastructure is continually at risk; not only from nation-state attackers, but also from malicious actors with unknown motives and goals,” comments Mieng Lim, VP of Product Management at Digital Defense Inc., a provider of vulnerability management and threat assessment solutions.The attack on Oldsmar’s water treatment system shows how critical national infrastructure is increasingly becoming a target for hackers as organizations bring systems online “Our dependency on critical infrastructure – power grids, utilities, water supplies, communications, financial services, emergency services, etc. – on a daily basis emphasizes the need to ensure the systems are defended against any adversary,” Mieng Lim adds. “Proactive security measures are crucial to safeguard critical infrastructure systems when perimeter defenses have been compromised or circumvented. We have to get back to the basics – re-evaluate and rebuild security protections from the ground up.” "This event reinforces the increasing need to authenticate not only users, but the devices and machine identities that are authorized to connect to an organization's network,” adds Chris Hickman, Chief Security Officer at digital identity security vendor Keyfactor. “If your only line of protection is user authentication, it will be compromised. It's not necessarily about who connects to the system, but what that user can access once they're inside. "If the network could have authenticated the validity of the device connecting to the network, the connection would have failed because hackers rarely have possession of authorized devices. This and other cases of hijacked user credentials can be limited or mitigated if devices are issued strong, crypto-derived, unique credentials like a digital certificate. In this case, it looks like the network had trust in the user credential but not in the validity of the device itself. Unfortunately, this kind of scenario is what can happen when zero trust is your end state, not your beginning point." “The attack on Oldsmar’s water treatment system shows how critical national infrastructure is increasingly becoming a target for hackers as organizations bring systems online for the first time as part of digital transformation projects,” says Gareth Williams, Vice President - Secure Communications & Information Systems, Thales UK. “While the move towards greater automation and connected switches and control systems brings unprecedented opportunities, it is not without risk, as anything that is brought online immediately becomes a target to be hacked.” Operational technology to mitigate attacks Williams advises organizations to approach Operational Technology as its own entity and put in place procedures that mitigate against the impact of an attack that could ultimately cost lives. This means understanding what is connected, who has access to it and what else might be at risk should that system be compromised, he says. “Once that is established, they can secure access through protocols like access management and fail-safe systems.”  “The cyberattack against the water supply in Oldsmar should come as a wakeup call,” says Saryu Nayyar, CEO, Gurucul.  “Cybersecurity professionals have been talking about infrastructure vulnerabilities for years, detailing the potential for attacks like this, and this is a near perfect example of what we have been warning about,” she says.  Although this attack was not successful, there is little doubt a skilled attacker could execute a similar infrastructure attack with more destructive results, says Nayyar. Organizations tasked with operating and protecting critical public infrastructure must assume the worst and take more serious measures to protect their environments, she advises. Fortunately, there were backup systems in place in Oldsmar. What could have been a tragedy instead became a cautionary tale. Both physical security and cybersecurity professionals should pay attention.

How Have Security Solutions Failed Our Schools?
How Have Security Solutions Failed Our Schools?

School shootings are a high-profile reminder of the need for the highest levels of security at our schools and education facilities. Increasingly, a remedy to boost the security at schools is to use more technology. However, no technology is a panacea, and ongoing violence and other threats at our schools suggest some level of failure. We asked this week’s Expert Panel Roundtable: How have security solutions failed our schools and what is the solution?